Week
4: Subsistence and Economy
Part 1. Subsistence
1. The benefits
of both subsistence patterns;
A) For hunters: it can feed the starving
family, food sharing; the egalitarian social relations; flexible division of
labor by gender; mobility.
B) For
Agriculture: to produce mass production of food according to the demand, the
technology and knowledge of proper farming and using the appropriate tools, the
industrialization of food, the marketing
or trade and exchange of product.
2. The cost or
the disadvantages of both subsistence patterns. For foraging, the supply of
food might not be enough of a long period of time, cultural evolution like
progress; intensive farming and the agriculture development with these the
foragers will be left behind and have scarcity of food. Another is the natural
phenomenon like weather especially for drought season where water or irrigation
is the main source of agriculture system.
3. I would say
both have its own advantages or that both provide a healthier diet. Before
technologies exist there is food foraging. They have the natural, healthy diet
because food comes from natural or organic which means no fertilizers or the
artificial feeds for animals. During this time, the main way to search food is
hunting, fishing and gathering wild plants. When the technologies impact the
foraging mode of subsistence, food production goes to higher level. Many used
fertilizers for agriculture products and feeds for animal herding or husbandry
to produce mass supply of food and also to cope with the demand. There are many
health and environmental issues upon using fertilizers and pesticides in
farming and studies shows that many of these result into a diseases and would
affect the human health not only in agriculture so as in the animal husbandry. However,
now people can still have the nutritional diet because some produces food in a
natural or organic way although today it cost much to live in a healthier diet
though not impossible but it is feasible to have healthy diet.
4. Human populations made the transition into
agriculture basically it offers the new technology on how to produce food. The
use of appropriate tools, irrigation, exact time (proper time of when the crop
is best to plant); knowledge of the pros and cons of farming; fertilizers and
pesticides. Another reason could be the mass production of food supply for the
demand, the urbanization and peasantry which made a strong impact toward the
culture change and into the subsistence, and the convenience of producing the
food rather than foraging, the agri-business which people can make money
through agriculture, the industrialization which many big companies give a
living for small farmers though capitalism takes place however in some point it
helps small farmers to continue cultivating their crops.
Part 2.
Economics and Trade
1. Direct
relationship between the availability of surplus and the ability to trade is
that there are products or goods which it is distributed or transferred to the
consumers and transaction of product involve between the surplus and the trade.
The availability of surplus created a production of product where it can supply
the demand and meet the desired equilibrium. The theory of supply and demand is an organizing
principle for explaining how prices coordinate the amounts produced and
consumed. In microeconomics, it
applies to price and output determination for a market with perfect
competition, which includes the condition of no buyers or sellers
large enough to have price-setting power. While
the ability trade is to do transaction or commerce the product in exchange from
a buyer either monetary or other products.
2. The two
social benefits of trade are the import and export of product. Through import
and export there is cultural exchange, a marketing network, create partnership
in economic development through international trade. In Asia, the ASEAN (The Association of
Southeast Asian Nations) was formed by the South East Asian countries for
geo-political and economic organization. It aims to the development of economic
growth, social progress and culture development. Another example of social
benefits of trading is the APEC (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation) composed of
21 countries including the United States. It aims to promote free trade and
economic cooperation throughout Asia-Pacific region. APEC’s main 3 pillars are:
Trade and Investment Liberalization, Business
Facilitation and Economic and Technical Cooperation.
3. The two negative
social results of the development of trade would be capitalism and industrialization. There is inequality, as wealth tends
to redound to a small percentage of the population; the demand for luxury goods
is often limited to a small percentage of the workforce and monopoly because of
the power they gain in the free market. While small farmers left behind as they
are the main labourer especially in agriculture system and thus sometimes they
depend on the big companies with power to gain free market.
4. The relationship between the development of
agriculture and the development of trade. Through the evolution of agriculture
it provides the impact of the environment, the production of the products, the
support system of trading and the economic. Thus, trading results to the
development of agriculture. Agriculture is considered as the main or primary
material production and it provides the physical goods for society’s survival
and I believe it is the foundation of trading. Thus, it is related to each
other mainly for the products exchanges. With the high demand for food, the
agriculture development help to produce the supply that must also meet the
demand and maintain the equilibrium as a result the development of trade exist
as it is considered the distribution of the products or goods in manner of
exchange either reciprocity, redistribution and market exchange.
Overall, well done. I just have a few comments and questions:
ReplyDeleteWhy do you think that with the advent of agriculture, foragers will be "left behind"? Is that a safe assumption?
The adoption of agriculture does not come automatically with new tools. Initially, agriculture required behavioral changes, not technological changes, so new tools wouldn't have been an incentive for adopting agricultural techniques. Also keep in mind that early food production techniques developed before we had a monetary system or even a reliable system of trade, or urbanization or "peasants". It was more rudimentary than that. Think 10,000 years ago.
In your last paragraph, you say: "Thus, trading results to the development of agriculture."
Isn't it the other way around? Which came first, agricultural practices or trade?
Thanks Professor Rodriguez. Now Im in a wrong track again. Well, I guess my idea is not good enough.
Delete"Well, I guess my idea is not good enough."
DeleteIt isn't an issue of being "good enough". This is a learning process and you shouldn't expect to get everything right the first time.
There were some questions in my comment to you. If you want to continue this learning process, feel free to review them and respond.
Your post is very to-the-point and sciency. I like it.
ReplyDeleteYou mentioned new tools, and Professor commented that the shift to agriculture doesn't just come with new tools. That's always true. But having a new industry that would benefit from new kinds of technology sort of opens the realm of inventions and fine-tuning. I guess it'll always take time, but new tools and techniques develop over time. Without moving into the farming department, there wouldn't have ever been a need for these things and they simply wouldn't exist.
"Agriculture is considered as the main or primary material production and it provides the physical goods for society’s survival and I believe it is the foundation of trading."
Foundation of trading indeed! CUTE LINE.
Thanks erica. I thought my idea is good but I guess not. It seems my idea is not accepted. Well, thats what I thought so because it all started in exchanging goods or trading and the early trading is called "barter". I can remember, my history class in high school that many native people started to trade their agricultural products to linen, china ware and etc. So thats how I came up to the idea that it all started there.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you Sally in that the weather can affect the agricultural system greatly by affecting their main source of food, especially with a drought. With such an uncontrollable factor, it is difficult to know that the following season will still supply the same amount of food necessary to sustain an entire family. I also agree that both patterns provide for a healthy diet, however I believe that an agricultural existence shows possibilities of physical effects on the human body. This can be seen with smaller stature and smaller jaws which limit the amount of teeth the mouth can hold.
ReplyDeletenice post
ReplyDeleteI agree with you in part one about each diet is healthy in their own ways.Hunters and gatherers eat from natural organic lands where the animals they hunt eat the same fruits and veggies they do. With the farmers their animals tend to eat from fertilized lands and sometimes even the slop and leftovers from the families who work the land. But with the agriculture they know exactly what they are eating and their body is used to the foods they are putting in their bodies and they dont have to worry about foraging and having to go looking for the next meal.